Changes to my study programme
I think that, in my career, Forest Engineering, they
should make many changes in the study programme. The main one, in my opinion,
is the organization in terms of field trips, they have been modifying them for
years, someone enters the race knowing what the practices of each year will be,
but then there are others. I also think that we have to add some subjects and
eliminate others. For example, the majority is focused on the industrial area
and nowadays, the approach should be extended much more, for example,
conservation, non-wood forest products, among other things, should take an
important place in the study programme. In addition, there are some elective
subjects that I believe should be an obligatory part of our university
education.
Another important issue, infrastructure, as a career we have
a building with 5 classrooms for around 400 students or more, I find it
unacceptable, we must lease the classrooms throughout the year to the career of
Agronomy. We must bear in mind that the campus has a fairly large area where
there could be another building for us.
Something that I also consider important to address, is the
workload and duration of the studies. Currently, at a general level, I think
the races are very long, and / or have too many subjects. That must be
regulated because I feel that, instead of obtaining more complete
professionals, what you get are professionals who know incomplete topics of
each area. Having so many subjects and being stressed, makes everyone worry
only about passing, no matter that the grade is regular, it is only relevant to
pass, because we do not want to delay another year in the race, 5 years are
already too long.
ReplyDeleteI agree, the number of years, the way the branches are organized, is not good enough
I agree with you.
ReplyDelete